Guinea-Bissau vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Guinea-Bissau
1,730 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lithuania
1,532 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
18th
Lithuania rank
21st

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lithuania
1.0k1.5k2.0k2.5k3.0k3.5k199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1,730 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,532 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 198 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th and Lithuania ranks 21st of 151 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 3,298 real chained 2019 US$ 1,056 real chained 2019 US$ 2,241 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 2,729 real chained 2019 US$ 1,184 real chained 2019 US$ 1,545 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2010s 2,033 real chained 2019 US$ 1,424 real chained 2019 US$ 608.07 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau
2020s 1,730 real chained 2019 US$ 1,532 real chained 2019 US$ 197.38 real chained 2019 US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Guinea-Bissau or Lithuania?
Guinea-Bissau, at 1,730 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,532 real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Guinea-Bissau and Lithuania?
198 real chained 2019 US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lithuania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Lithuania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th and Lithuania ranks 21st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guinea-bissau/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guinea-bissau/lithuania/">Guinea-Bissau vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.