Guatemala vs Kenya: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Guatemala
527.27 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Kenya
506.44 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
63rd
Kenya rank
65th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Guatemala
  • Kenya
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 527.27 real chained 2019 US$ against 506.44 real chained 2019 US$ in Kenya, a difference of 20.83 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 63rd and Kenya ranks 65th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 3 and Kenya in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Kenya Difference Ahead
1990s 1,024 real chained 2019 US$ 1,011 real chained 2019 US$ 13.8 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2000s 789.46 real chained 2019 US$ 790.62 real chained 2019 US$ 1.16 real chained 2019 US$ Kenya
2010s 592.05 real chained 2019 US$ 564.28 real chained 2019 US$ 27.78 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala
2020s 527.27 real chained 2019 US$ 506.44 real chained 2019 US$ 20.84 real chained 2019 US$ Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Guatemala or Kenya?
Guatemala, at 527.27 real chained 2019 US$ against 506.44 real chained 2019 US$ in Kenya as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Guatemala and Kenya?
20.83 real chained 2019 US$, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Kenya?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Kenya rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Guatemala ranks 63rd and Kenya ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Kenya: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/kenya/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/guatemala/kenya/">Guatemala vs Kenya: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.