Ghana vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Ghana
975.02 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,053 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ghana rank
33rd
Montenegro rank
30th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Ghana
  • Montenegro
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ against 975.02 real chained 2019 US$ in Ghana, a difference of 77.98 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.1 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Ghana ahead.

Ghana ranks 33rd and Montenegro ranks 30th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,314 real chained 2019 US$ 1,033 real chained 2019 US$ 281.33 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2010s 1,095 real chained 2019 US$ 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ 41.75 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2020s 975.02 real chained 2019 US$ 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ 78.27 real chained 2019 US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Ghana or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ against 975.02 real chained 2019 US$ in Ghana as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Ghana and Montenegro?
77.98 real chained 2019 US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Ghana and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Ghana ranks 33rd and Montenegro ranks 30th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ghana vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/ghana/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/ghana/montenegro/">Ghana vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.