Germany vs Hungary: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Germany
365.49 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Hungary
379.96 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Germany rank
75th
Hungary rank
74th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Germany
  • Hungary
0100200300400199520072020

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 379.96 real chained 2019 US$ against 365.49 real chained 2019 US$ in Germany, a difference of 14.47 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 75th and Hungary ranks 74th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Hungary in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 368.23 real chained 2019 US$ 336.09 real chained 2019 US$ 32.15 real chained 2019 US$ Germany
2000s 367.92 real chained 2019 US$ 358.24 real chained 2019 US$ 9.67 real chained 2019 US$ Germany
2010s 372.08 real chained 2019 US$ 377.6 real chained 2019 US$ 5.52 real chained 2019 US$ Hungary
2020s 365.49 real chained 2019 US$ 379.96 real chained 2019 US$ 14.47 real chained 2019 US$ Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Germany or Hungary?
Hungary, at 379.96 real chained 2019 US$ against 365.49 real chained 2019 US$ in Germany as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Germany and Hungary?
14.47 real chained 2019 US$, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Hungary?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Germany and Hungary rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Germany ranks 75th and Hungary ranks 74th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Hungary: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/germany/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/germany/hungary/">Germany vs Hungary: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.