Gabon vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Gabon
4,039 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malaysia
4,635 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Gabon rank
8th
Malaysia rank
7th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Gabon
  • Malaysia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Malaysia currently reports 4,635 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,039 real chained 2019 US$ in Gabon, a difference of 596 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Gabon ahead.

Gabon ranks 8th and Malaysia ranks 7th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Gabon averaged higher in 2 and Malaysia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Malaysia Difference Ahead
1990s 7,917 real chained 2019 US$ 7,578 real chained 2019 US$ 338.7 real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2000s 6,480 real chained 2019 US$ 6,116 real chained 2019 US$ 363.76 real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2010s 4,708 real chained 2019 US$ 5,036 real chained 2019 US$ 328.43 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia
2020s 4,039 real chained 2019 US$ 4,635 real chained 2019 US$ 595.87 real chained 2019 US$ Malaysia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Gabon or Malaysia?
Malaysia, at 4,635 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,039 real chained 2019 US$ in Gabon as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Gabon and Malaysia?
596 real chained 2019 US$, with Malaysia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Malaysia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Gabon and Malaysia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Gabon ranks 8th and Malaysia ranks 7th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gabon vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/gabon/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/gabon/malaysia/">Gabon vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.