Finland vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Finland
3,698 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
3,527 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Finland rank
9th
Suriname rank
10th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Finland
  • Suriname
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Finland currently reports 3,698 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,527 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname, a difference of 171 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.

Finland ranks 9th and Suriname ranks 10th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 3,956 real chained 2019 US$ 4,821 real chained 2019 US$ 865.43 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 3,889 real chained 2019 US$ 4,245 real chained 2019 US$ 355.79 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 3,738 real chained 2019 US$ 3,755 real chained 2019 US$ 17.33 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 3,698 real chained 2019 US$ 3,527 real chained 2019 US$ 171.25 real chained 2019 US$ Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Finland or Suriname?
Finland, at 3,698 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,527 real chained 2019 US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Finland and Suriname?
171 real chained 2019 US$, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Finland and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Finland ranks 9th and Suriname ranks 10th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/finland/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/finland/suriname/">Finland vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.