Finland vs Gabon: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Finland
3,698 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Gabon
4,039 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Finland rank
9th
Gabon rank
8th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Finland
  • Gabon
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k199520072020

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 4,039 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,698 real chained 2019 US$ in Finland, a difference of 341 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 9th and Gabon ranks 8th of 151 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Gabon Difference Ahead
1990s 3,956 real chained 2019 US$ 7,917 real chained 2019 US$ 3,961 real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2000s 3,889 real chained 2019 US$ 6,480 real chained 2019 US$ 2,591 real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2010s 3,738 real chained 2019 US$ 4,708 real chained 2019 US$ 969.52 real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2020s 3,698 real chained 2019 US$ 4,039 real chained 2019 US$ 341.2 real chained 2019 US$ Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Finland or Gabon?
Gabon, at 4,039 real chained 2019 US$ against 3,698 real chained 2019 US$ in Finland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Finland and Gabon?
341 real chained 2019 US$, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Gabon?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Finland and Gabon rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Finland ranks 9th and Gabon ranks 8th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Gabon: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/finland/gabon/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/finland/gabon/">Finland vs Gabon: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.