Eswatini vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Eswatini
1,061 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,053 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Eswatini rank
29th
Montenegro rank
30th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Eswatini
  • Montenegro
02505007501.0k199520072020

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1,061 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro, a difference of 8 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 30th of 151 countries.

Eswatini has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 1,049 real chained 2019 US$ 1,033 real chained 2019 US$ 16.6 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini
2010s 1,062 real chained 2019 US$ 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ 8.99 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini
2020s 1,061 real chained 2019 US$ 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ 7.24 real chained 2019 US$ Eswatini

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Eswatini or Montenegro?
Eswatini, at 1,061 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,053 real chained 2019 US$ in Montenegro as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Eswatini and Montenegro?
8 real chained 2019 US$, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Montenegro?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Eswatini and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Eswatini ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 30th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/eswatini/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/eswatini/montenegro/">Eswatini vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.