Estonia vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Estonia
5,065 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Uruguay
4,746 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Estonia rank
4th
Uruguay rank
6th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Estonia
  • Uruguay
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 5,065 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,746 real chained 2019 US$ in Uruguay, a difference of 319 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Estonia ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 151 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Estonia Uruguay Difference Ahead
1990s 4,125 real chained 2019 US$ 2,957 real chained 2019 US$ 1,168 real chained 2019 US$ Estonia
2000s 4,425 real chained 2019 US$ 3,699 real chained 2019 US$ 725.75 real chained 2019 US$ Estonia
2010s 4,991 real chained 2019 US$ 4,448 real chained 2019 US$ 542.71 real chained 2019 US$ Estonia
2020s 5,065 real chained 2019 US$ 4,746 real chained 2019 US$ 319.43 real chained 2019 US$ Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Estonia or Uruguay?
Estonia, at 5,065 real chained 2019 US$ against 4,746 real chained 2019 US$ in Uruguay as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Estonia and Uruguay?
319 real chained 2019 US$, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Uruguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Estonia and Uruguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Estonia ranks 4th and Uruguay ranks 6th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Estonia vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/estonia/uruguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/estonia/uruguay/">Estonia vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.