Egypt vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Egypt
1.42 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Iceland
1.84 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
144th
Iceland rank
143rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Egypt
  • Iceland
11.522.53199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1.84 real chained 2019 US$ against 1.42 real chained 2019 US$ in Egypt, a difference of 0.42 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.3 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 144th and Iceland ranks 143rd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 2.75 real chained 2019 US$ 1.02 real chained 2019 US$ 1.73 real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2000s 2.69 real chained 2019 US$ 1.48 real chained 2019 US$ 1.21 real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2010s 1.88 real chained 2019 US$ 1.86 real chained 2019 US$ 0.0188 real chained 2019 US$ Egypt
2020s 1.42 real chained 2019 US$ 1.84 real chained 2019 US$ 0.4281 real chained 2019 US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Egypt or Iceland?
Iceland, at 1.84 real chained 2019 US$ against 1.42 real chained 2019 US$ in Egypt as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Egypt and Iceland?
0.42 real chained 2019 US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Egypt and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Egypt ranks 144th and Iceland ranks 143rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/">Egypt vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.