Ecuador vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Ecuador
413.3 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Mali
431.72 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
72nd
Mali rank
69th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Ecuador
  • Mali
02004006008001.0k199520072020

How they compare

Mali currently reports 431.72 real chained 2019 US$ against 413.3 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 18.42 real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 72nd and Mali ranks 69th of 151 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Mali Difference Ahead
1990s 679.95 real chained 2019 US$ 882.9 real chained 2019 US$ 202.95 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2000s 572.82 real chained 2019 US$ 709.15 real chained 2019 US$ 136.33 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2010s 464.03 real chained 2019 US$ 515.25 real chained 2019 US$ 51.23 real chained 2019 US$ Mali
2020s 413.3 real chained 2019 US$ 431.72 real chained 2019 US$ 18.42 real chained 2019 US$ Mali

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Ecuador or Mali?
Mali, at 431.72 real chained 2019 US$ against 413.3 real chained 2019 US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Ecuador and Mali?
18.42 real chained 2019 US$, with Mali ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mali?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Mali rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Ecuador ranks 72nd and Mali ranks 69th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/mali/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/mali/">Ecuador vs Mali: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.