Ecuador vs Hungary: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Ecuador
413.3 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Hungary
379.96 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
72nd
Hungary rank
74th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Ecuador
  • Hungary
0200400600800199520072020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 413.3 real chained 2019 US$ against 379.96 real chained 2019 US$ in Hungary, a difference of 33.34 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 72nd and Hungary ranks 74th of 151 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 679.95 real chained 2019 US$ 336.09 real chained 2019 US$ 343.86 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2000s 572.82 real chained 2019 US$ 358.24 real chained 2019 US$ 214.58 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2010s 464.03 real chained 2019 US$ 377.6 real chained 2019 US$ 86.43 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador
2020s 413.3 real chained 2019 US$ 379.96 real chained 2019 US$ 33.34 real chained 2019 US$ Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Ecuador or Hungary?
Ecuador, at 413.3 real chained 2019 US$ against 379.96 real chained 2019 US$ in Hungary as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Ecuador and Hungary?
33.34 real chained 2019 US$, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Hungary?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Hungary rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Ecuador ranks 72nd and Hungary ranks 74th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Hungary: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/hungary/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/ecuador/hungary/">Ecuador vs Hungary: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.