Croatia vs Ghana: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Croatia
893.53 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ghana
975.02 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
36th
Ghana rank
33rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Croatia
  • Ghana
05001.0k1.5k2.0k199520072020

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 975.02 real chained 2019 US$ against 893.53 real chained 2019 US$ in Croatia, a difference of 81.49 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Ghana's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Ghana has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 151 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Ghana Difference Ahead
1990s 848.93 real chained 2019 US$ 1,986 real chained 2019 US$ 1,137 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2000s 901.57 real chained 2019 US$ 1,507 real chained 2019 US$ 605.54 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2010s 922 real chained 2019 US$ 1,095 real chained 2019 US$ 172.84 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana
2020s 893.53 real chained 2019 US$ 975.02 real chained 2019 US$ 81.5 real chained 2019 US$ Ghana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Croatia or Ghana?
Ghana, at 975.02 real chained 2019 US$ against 893.53 real chained 2019 US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Croatia and Ghana?
81.49 real chained 2019 US$, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Ghana?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Ghana rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Croatia ranks 36th and Ghana ranks 33rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Ghana: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/croatia/ghana/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/croatia/ghana/">Croatia vs Ghana: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.