Costa Rica vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Costa Rica
2,323 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Suriname
3,527 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Costa Rica rank
13th
Suriname rank
10th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Suriname
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 3,527 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 1,204 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.5 times Costa Rica's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Costa Rica ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 10th of 151 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 3,016 real chained 2019 US$ 4,821 real chained 2019 US$ 1,805 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2000s 2,629 real chained 2019 US$ 4,245 real chained 2019 US$ 1,616 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2010s 2,376 real chained 2019 US$ 3,755 real chained 2019 US$ 1,380 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname
2020s 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ 3,527 real chained 2019 US$ 1,204 real chained 2019 US$ Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Costa Rica or Suriname?
Suriname, at 3,527 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Costa Rica and Suriname?
1,204 real chained 2019 US$, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Costa Rica and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Costa Rica ranks 13th and Suriname ranks 10th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 31 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/costa-rica/suriname/">Costa Rica vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.