Congo vs Liberia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Congo
1,894 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Liberia
2,266 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
16th
Liberia rank
15th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Congo
  • Liberia
2.0k3.0k4.0k5.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Liberia currently reports 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,894 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 372 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Liberia's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Liberia has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 16th and Liberia ranks 15th of 151 countries.

Liberia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Liberia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,807 real chained 2019 US$ 5,231 real chained 2019 US$ 1,424 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2000s 3,017 real chained 2019 US$ 3,729 real chained 2019 US$ 712.12 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2010s 2,175 real chained 2019 US$ 2,604 real chained 2019 US$ 429.12 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2020s 1,894 real chained 2019 US$ 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ 371.95 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Congo or Liberia?
Liberia, at 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,894 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Congo and Liberia?
372 real chained 2019 US$, with Liberia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Liberia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Liberia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Congo ranks 16th and Liberia ranks 15th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Liberia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/liberia/">Congo vs Liberia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.