Congo vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Congo
1,894 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Costa Rica
2,323 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo rank
16th
Costa Rica rank
13th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Congo
  • Costa Rica
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,894 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 429 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Congo ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 3,807 real chained 2019 US$ 3,016 real chained 2019 US$ 790.44 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 3,017 real chained 2019 US$ 2,629 real chained 2019 US$ 387.6 real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 2,175 real chained 2019 US$ 2,376 real chained 2019 US$ 200.52 real chained 2019 US$ Costa Rica
2020s 1,894 real chained 2019 US$ 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ 428.86 real chained 2019 US$ Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Congo or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,894 real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Congo and Costa Rica?
429 real chained 2019 US$, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Costa Rica?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Congo and Costa Rica rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Congo ranks 16th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/congo-rep/costa-rica/">Congo vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.