Colombia vs Spain: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Colombia
154.85 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Spain
162.66 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Colombia rank
105th
Spain rank
103rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Colombia
  • Spain
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Spain currently reports 162.66 real chained 2019 US$ against 154.85 real chained 2019 US$ in Colombia, a difference of 7.81 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Spain's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Colombia ahead.

Colombia ranks 105th and Spain ranks 103rd of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Spain in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Spain Difference Ahead
1990s 242.84 real chained 2019 US$ 162.41 real chained 2019 US$ 80.42 real chained 2019 US$ Colombia
2000s 209.57 real chained 2019 US$ 167.01 real chained 2019 US$ 42.56 real chained 2019 US$ Colombia
2010s 174.97 real chained 2019 US$ 164.53 real chained 2019 US$ 10.44 real chained 2019 US$ Colombia
2020s 154.85 real chained 2019 US$ 162.66 real chained 2019 US$ 7.81 real chained 2019 US$ Spain

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Colombia or Spain?
Spain, at 162.66 real chained 2019 US$ against 154.85 real chained 2019 US$ in Colombia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Colombia and Spain?
7.81 real chained 2019 US$, with Spain ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Spain?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Spain rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Colombia ranks 105th and Spain ranks 103rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Spain: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/colombia/spain/">Colombia vs Spain: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.