Chile vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Chile
2,690 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Costa Rica
2,323 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Chile rank
11th
Costa Rica rank
13th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Chile
  • Costa Rica
01.0k2.0k3.0k199520072020

How they compare

Chile currently reports 2,690 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica, a difference of 367 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.2 times Costa Rica's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Costa Rica ahead.

Chile ranks 11th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Costa Rica in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1990s 3,014 real chained 2019 US$ 3,016 real chained 2019 US$ 2.32 real chained 2019 US$ Costa Rica
2000s 2,875 real chained 2019 US$ 2,629 real chained 2019 US$ 246.5 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2010s 2,785 real chained 2019 US$ 2,376 real chained 2019 US$ 409.39 real chained 2019 US$ Chile
2020s 2,690 real chained 2019 US$ 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ 366.91 real chained 2019 US$ Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Chile or Costa Rica?
Chile, at 2,690 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,323 real chained 2019 US$ in Costa Rica as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Chile and Costa Rica?
367 real chained 2019 US$, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Chile ranks 11th and Costa Rica ranks 13th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.