Burkina Faso vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Burkina Faso
462.89 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Sudan
458.43 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Burkina Faso rank
66th
Sudan rank
67th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Burkina Faso
  • Sudan
02505007501.0k1.2k199520072020

How they compare

Burkina Faso currently reports 462.89 real chained 2019 US$ against 458.43 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan, a difference of 4.46 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.

Burkina Faso ranks 66th and Sudan ranks 67th of 151 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Burkina Faso Sudan Difference Ahead
2010s 546.04 real chained 2019 US$ 548.31 real chained 2019 US$ 2.27 real chained 2019 US$ Sudan
2020s 462.89 real chained 2019 US$ 458.43 real chained 2019 US$ 4.46 real chained 2019 US$ Burkina Faso

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Burkina Faso or Sudan?
Burkina Faso, at 462.89 real chained 2019 US$ against 458.43 real chained 2019 US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Burkina Faso and Sudan?
4.46 real chained 2019 US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Sudan?
9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
How do Burkina Faso and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Burkina Faso ranks 66th and Sudan ranks 67th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burkina Faso vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/burkina-faso/sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/burkina-faso/sudan/">Burkina Faso vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.