Bolivia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Bolivia
363.49 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi
354.37 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Bolivia rank
78th
Malawi rank
79th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Bolivia
  • Malawi
02004006008001.0k199520072020

How they compare

Bolivia currently reports 363.49 real chained 2019 US$ against 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi, a difference of 9.12 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malawi ahead.

Bolivia ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 79th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Bolivia averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bolivia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 600.39 real chained 2019 US$ 934.52 real chained 2019 US$ 334.13 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 508.37 real chained 2019 US$ 706.55 real chained 2019 US$ 198.18 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2010s 407.8 real chained 2019 US$ 457.04 real chained 2019 US$ 49.24 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2020s 363.49 real chained 2019 US$ 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ 9.12 real chained 2019 US$ Bolivia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Bolivia or Malawi?
Bolivia, at 363.49 real chained 2019 US$ against 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Bolivia and Malawi?
9.12 real chained 2019 US$, with Bolivia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bolivia and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Bolivia ranks 78th and Malawi ranks 79th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bolivia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/bolivia/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/bolivia/malawi/">Bolivia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.