Belgium vs Spain: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Belgium
172.56 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Spain
162.66 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
102nd
Spain rank
103rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Belgium
  • Spain
050100150200199520072020

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 172.56 real chained 2019 US$ against 162.66 real chained 2019 US$ in Spain, a difference of 9.9 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Spain's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 102nd and Spain ranks 103rd of 151 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Spain Difference Ahead
1990s 190.19 real chained 2019 US$ 162.41 real chained 2019 US$ 27.78 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium
2000s 186.7 real chained 2019 US$ 167.01 real chained 2019 US$ 19.69 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium
2010s 177.38 real chained 2019 US$ 164.53 real chained 2019 US$ 12.85 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium
2020s 172.56 real chained 2019 US$ 162.66 real chained 2019 US$ 9.9 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Belgium or Spain?
Belgium, at 172.56 real chained 2019 US$ against 162.66 real chained 2019 US$ in Spain as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Belgium and Spain?
9.9 real chained 2019 US$, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Spain?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belgium and Spain rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Belgium ranks 102nd and Spain ranks 103rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Spain: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/spain/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/spain/">Belgium vs Spain: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.