Belgium vs Comoros: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Belgium
172.56 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Comoros
157.1 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
102nd
Comoros rank
104th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Belgium
  • Comoros
0100200300199520072020

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 172.56 real chained 2019 US$ against 157.1 real chained 2019 US$ in Comoros, a difference of 15.46 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Comoros ahead.

Belgium ranks 102nd and Comoros ranks 104th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Comoros in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Comoros Difference Ahead
1990s 190.19 real chained 2019 US$ 327.91 real chained 2019 US$ 137.72 real chained 2019 US$ Comoros
2000s 186.7 real chained 2019 US$ 261.08 real chained 2019 US$ 74.39 real chained 2019 US$ Comoros
2010s 177.38 real chained 2019 US$ 189.08 real chained 2019 US$ 11.7 real chained 2019 US$ Comoros
2020s 172.56 real chained 2019 US$ 157.1 real chained 2019 US$ 15.45 real chained 2019 US$ Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Belgium or Comoros?
Belgium, at 172.56 real chained 2019 US$ against 157.1 real chained 2019 US$ in Comoros as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Belgium and Comoros?
15.46 real chained 2019 US$, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Comoros?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belgium and Comoros rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Belgium ranks 102nd and Comoros ranks 104th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Comoros: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 17 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/comoros/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/comoros/">Belgium vs Comoros: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.