Belarus vs Paraguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Belarus
1,689 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Paraguay
1,815 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
19th
Paraguay rank
17th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Belarus
  • Paraguay
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Paraguay currently reports 1,815 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,689 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus, a difference of 126 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Paraguay's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Belarus ranks 19th and Paraguay ranks 17th of 151 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Paraguay Difference Ahead
1990s 1,509 real chained 2019 US$ 3,686 real chained 2019 US$ 2,176 real chained 2019 US$ Paraguay
2000s 1,597 real chained 2019 US$ 2,953 real chained 2019 US$ 1,356 real chained 2019 US$ Paraguay
2010s 1,673 real chained 2019 US$ 2,176 real chained 2019 US$ 503.05 real chained 2019 US$ Paraguay
2020s 1,689 real chained 2019 US$ 1,815 real chained 2019 US$ 125.95 real chained 2019 US$ Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Belarus or Paraguay?
Paraguay, at 1,815 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,689 real chained 2019 US$ in Belarus as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Belarus and Paraguay?
126 real chained 2019 US$, with Paraguay ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Paraguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Paraguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Belarus ranks 19th and Paraguay ranks 17th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Paraguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/belarus/paraguay/">Belarus vs Paraguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.