Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Lesotho: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Azerbaijan, Republic of
23.35 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lesotho
41.29 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Azerbaijan, Republic of rank
126th
Lesotho rank
123rd

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Azerbaijan, Republic of
  • Lesotho
01020304050199520072020

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 41.29 real chained 2019 US$ against 23.35 real chained 2019 US$ in Azerbaijan, Republic of, a difference of 17.94 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.8 times Azerbaijan, Republic of's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.

Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 126th and Lesotho ranks 123rd of 151 countries.

Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Azerbaijan, Republic of Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s 25.9 real chained 2019 US$ 47.29 real chained 2019 US$ 21.39 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho
2000s 24.99 real chained 2019 US$ 46.73 real chained 2019 US$ 21.75 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho
2010s 23.4 real chained 2019 US$ 44.06 real chained 2019 US$ 20.66 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho
2020s 23.35 real chained 2019 US$ 41.29 real chained 2019 US$ 17.94 real chained 2019 US$ Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Azerbaijan, Republic of or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 41.29 real chained 2019 US$ against 23.35 real chained 2019 US$ in Azerbaijan, Republic of as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Azerbaijan, Republic of and Lesotho?
17.94 real chained 2019 US$, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Azerbaijan, Republic of and Lesotho?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Azerbaijan, Republic of and Lesotho rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Azerbaijan, Republic of ranks 126th and Lesotho ranks 123rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Lesotho: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 18 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/azerbaijan/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/azerbaijan/lesotho/">Azerbaijan, Republic of vs Lesotho: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.