Australia vs Paraguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Australia
2,291 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Paraguay
1,815 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
14th
Paraguay rank
17th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Australia
  • Paraguay
01.0k2.0k3.0k4.0k199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2,291 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,815 real chained 2019 US$ in Paraguay, a difference of 476 real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Paraguay's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Paraguay ahead.

Australia ranks 14th and Paraguay ranks 17th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Paraguay Difference Ahead
1990s 3,154 real chained 2019 US$ 3,686 real chained 2019 US$ 531.67 real chained 2019 US$ Paraguay
2000s 2,846 real chained 2019 US$ 2,953 real chained 2019 US$ 107.19 real chained 2019 US$ Paraguay
2010s 2,454 real chained 2019 US$ 2,176 real chained 2019 US$ 277.28 real chained 2019 US$ Australia
2020s 2,291 real chained 2019 US$ 1,815 real chained 2019 US$ 475.29 real chained 2019 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Australia or Paraguay?
Australia, at 2,291 real chained 2019 US$ against 1,815 real chained 2019 US$ in Paraguay as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Australia and Paraguay?
476 real chained 2019 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Paraguay?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Paraguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Australia ranks 14th and Paraguay ranks 17th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Paraguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/australia/paraguay/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/australia/paraguay/">Australia vs Paraguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.