Australia vs Liberia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Australia
2,291 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Liberia
2,266 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Australia rank
14th
Liberia rank
15th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Australia
  • Liberia
02.0k4.0k6.0k199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 2,291 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ in Liberia, a difference of 25 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Liberia ahead.

Australia ranks 14th and Liberia ranks 15th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and Liberia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Liberia Difference Ahead
1990s 3,154 real chained 2019 US$ 5,231 real chained 2019 US$ 2,077 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2000s 2,846 real chained 2019 US$ 3,729 real chained 2019 US$ 882.56 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2010s 2,454 real chained 2019 US$ 2,604 real chained 2019 US$ 150.81 real chained 2019 US$ Liberia
2020s 2,291 real chained 2019 US$ 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ 24.16 real chained 2019 US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Australia or Liberia?
Australia, at 2,291 real chained 2019 US$ against 2,266 real chained 2019 US$ in Liberia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Australia and Liberia?
25 real chained 2019 US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Liberia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Liberia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Australia ranks 14th and Liberia ranks 15th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Liberia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/australia/liberia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/australia/liberia/">Australia vs Liberia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.