Argentina vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber

Argentina
365.11 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malawi
354.37 real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Argentina rank
76th
Malawi rank
79th

Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time

  • Argentina
  • Malawi
02004006008001.0k199520072020

How they compare

Argentina currently reports 365.11 real chained 2019 US$ against 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi, a difference of 10.74 real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malawi ahead.

Argentina ranks 76th and Malawi ranks 79th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 1 and Malawi in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 549.58 real chained 2019 US$ 934.52 real chained 2019 US$ 384.93 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2000s 477.4 real chained 2019 US$ 706.55 real chained 2019 US$ 229.14 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2010s 397.1 real chained 2019 US$ 457.04 real chained 2019 US$ 59.94 real chained 2019 US$ Malawi
2020s 365.11 real chained 2019 US$ 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ 10.74 real chained 2019 US$ Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Argentina or Malawi?
Argentina, at 365.11 real chained 2019 US$ against 354.37 real chained 2019 US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Argentina and Malawi?
10.74 real chained 2019 US$, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
Argentina ranks 76th and Malawi ranks 79th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Argentina vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-per-capita-timber-real-chained-2019-us/argentina/malawi/">Argentina vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.