Saudi Arabia vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Saudi Arabia
5.29 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
5.3 current US$
in 2020
Saudi Arabia rank
136th
Tunisia rank
135th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Saudi Arabia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 5.3 current US$ against 5.29 current US$ in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.01 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saudi Arabia ahead.
Saudi Arabia ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 135th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Saudi Arabia averaged higher in 2 and Tunisia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Saudi Arabia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.38 current US$ | 0.9947 current US$ | 1.39 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2000s | 2.77 current US$ | 2.07 current US$ | 0.6969 current US$ | Saudi Arabia |
| 2010s | 6.82 current US$ | 7.26 current US$ | 0.4363 current US$ | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 5.29 current US$ | 5.3 current US$ | 0.0091 current US$ | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Saudi Arabia or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 5.3 current US$ against 5.29 current US$ in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
- 0.01 current US$, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saudi Arabia and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Saudi Arabia and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Saudi Arabia ranks 136th and Tunisia ranks 135th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.