Peru vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Peru
197.6 current US$
in 2020
Uganda
206.72 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
101st
Uganda rank
98th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Peru
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 206.72 current US$ against 197.6 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 9.12 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Uganda has been ahead every year.
Peru ranks 101st and Uganda ranks 98th of 150 countries.
Uganda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 128.79 current US$ | 305.26 current US$ | 176.48 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2000s | 123.96 current US$ | 205.59 current US$ | 81.63 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2010s | 275.01 current US$ | 316.57 current US$ | 41.56 current US$ | Uganda |
| 2020s | 197.6 current US$ | 206.72 current US$ | 9.12 current US$ | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Peru or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 206.72 current US$ against 197.6 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Peru and Uganda?
- 9.12 current US$, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Uganda?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Uganda rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Peru ranks 101st and Uganda ranks 98th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.