Peru vs Switzerland: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Peru
197.6 current US$
in 2020
Switzerland
201.98 current US$
in 2020
Peru rank
101st
Switzerland rank
99th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Peru
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 201.98 current US$ against 197.6 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 4.38 current US$.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Switzerland ahead.
Peru ranks 101st and Switzerland ranks 99th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Switzerland in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 128.79 current US$ | 204.54 current US$ | 75.75 current US$ | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 123.96 current US$ | 229.8 current US$ | 105.84 current US$ | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 275.01 current US$ | 241.68 current US$ | 33.33 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 197.6 current US$ | 201.98 current US$ | 4.38 current US$ | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Peru or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 201.98 current US$ against 197.6 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Peru and Switzerland?
- 4.38 current US$, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Switzerland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Peru and Switzerland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Peru ranks 101st and Switzerland ranks 99th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.