Nicaragua vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Nicaragua
719.93 current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
724.74 current US$
in 2020
Nicaragua rank
46th
Zimbabwe rank
45th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Nicaragua
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 724.74 current US$ against 719.93 current US$ in Nicaragua, a difference of 4.81 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Nicaragua ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 150 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nicaragua | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 369.08 current US$ | 519.35 current US$ | 150.27 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 327.55 current US$ | 552.45 current US$ | 224.9 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 829.46 current US$ | 924.74 current US$ | 95.29 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 719.93 current US$ | 724.74 current US$ | 4.8 current US$ | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Nicaragua or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 724.74 current US$ against 719.93 current US$ in Nicaragua as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 4.81 current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Zimbabwe?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Nicaragua and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Nicaragua ranks 46th and Zimbabwe ranks 45th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.