Mongolia vs Peru: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Mongolia
198.04 current US$
in 2020
Peru
197.6 current US$
in 2020
Mongolia rank
100th
Peru rank
101st
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Mongolia
- Peru
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 198.04 current US$ against 197.6 current US$ in Peru, a difference of 0.44 current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mongolia ahead.
Mongolia ranks 100th and Peru ranks 101st of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 3 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 153.83 current US$ | 128.79 current US$ | 25.04 current US$ | Mongolia |
| 2000s | 135.13 current US$ | 123.96 current US$ | 11.17 current US$ | Mongolia |
| 2010s | 231.45 current US$ | 275.01 current US$ | 43.56 current US$ | Peru |
| 2020s | 198.04 current US$ | 197.6 current US$ | 0.437 current US$ | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Mongolia or Peru?
- Mongolia, at 198.04 current US$ against 197.6 current US$ in Peru as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Mongolia and Peru?
- 0.44 current US$, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Peru?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mongolia and Peru rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Mongolia ranks 100th and Peru ranks 101st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.