Mauritius vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Mauritius
5.73 current US$
in 2020
Tunisia
5.3 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius rank
134th
Tunisia rank
135th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Mauritius
- Tunisia
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 5.73 current US$ against 5.3 current US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 0.43 current US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 135th of 150 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14.58 current US$ | 0.9947 current US$ | 13.58 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 12.48 current US$ | 2.07 current US$ | 10.4 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 7.35 current US$ | 7.26 current US$ | 0.0942 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 5.73 current US$ | 5.3 current US$ | 0.4294 current US$ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Mauritius or Tunisia?
- Mauritius, at 5.73 current US$ against 5.3 current US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Mauritius and Tunisia?
- 0.43 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Mauritius and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Mauritius ranks 134th and Tunisia ranks 135th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.