Maldives vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Maldives
1.53 current US$
in 2020
Singapore
3.27 current US$
in 2020
Maldives rank
143rd
Singapore rank
141st
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Maldives
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 3.27 current US$ against 1.53 current US$ in Maldives, a difference of 1.74 current US$.
That makes Singapore's figure about 2.1 times Maldives's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.
Maldives ranks 143rd and Singapore ranks 141st of 150 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Maldives | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.9732 current US$ | 4.29 current US$ | 3.32 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2000s | 1.13 current US$ | 3.44 current US$ | 2.31 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2010s | 2.2 current US$ | 5.08 current US$ | 2.88 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2020s | 1.53 current US$ | 3.27 current US$ | 1.74 current US$ | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Maldives or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 3.27 current US$ against 1.53 current US$ in Maldives as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Maldives and Singapore?
- 1.74 current US$, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Maldives and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Maldives and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Maldives ranks 143rd and Singapore ranks 141st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.