Malaysia vs Uruguay: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Malaysia
4,416 current US$
in 2020
Uruguay
4,853 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia rank
8th
Uruguay rank
7th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Malaysia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 4,853 current US$ against 4,416 current US$ in Malaysia, a difference of 437 current US$.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Malaysia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malaysia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 8th and Uruguay ranks 7th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Malaysia averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,784 current US$ | 609.66 current US$ | 6,174 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 5,251 current US$ | 1,191 current US$ | 4,059 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 5,252 current US$ | 4,599 current US$ | 653.03 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 4,416 current US$ | 4,853 current US$ | 436.18 current US$ | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Malaysia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 4,853 current US$ against 4,416 current US$ in Malaysia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 437 current US$, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Uruguay?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Malaysia and Uruguay rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Malaysia ranks 8th and Uruguay ranks 7th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.