Malaysia vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Malaysia
4,416 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
3,763 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia rank
8th
Suriname rank
10th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Malaysia
- Suriname
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 4,416 current US$ against 3,763 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 653 current US$.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Suriname's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Malaysia ranks 8th and Suriname ranks 10th of 150 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 6,784 current US$ | 302.41 current US$ | 6,481 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 5,251 current US$ | 343.57 current US$ | 4,907 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 5,252 current US$ | 2,244 current US$ | 3,008 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 4,416 current US$ | 3,763 current US$ | 653.14 current US$ | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Malaysia or Suriname?
- Malaysia, at 4,416 current US$ against 3,763 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Malaysia and Suriname?
- 653 current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Malaysia and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Malaysia ranks 8th and Suriname ranks 10th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.