Jordan vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Jordan
7.31 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
5.73 current US$
in 2020
Jordan rank
132nd
Mauritius rank
134th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Jordan
- Mauritius
How they compare
Jordan currently reports 7.31 current US$ against 5.73 current US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 1.58 current US$.
That makes Jordan's figure about 1.3 times Mauritius's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritius ahead.
Jordan ranks 132nd and Mauritius ranks 134th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 2 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 9.4 current US$ | 14.58 current US$ | 5.17 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 7.55 current US$ | 12.48 current US$ | 4.93 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 12.3 current US$ | 7.35 current US$ | 4.95 current US$ | Jordan |
| 2020s | 7.31 current US$ | 5.73 current US$ | 1.58 current US$ | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Jordan or Mauritius?
- Jordan, at 7.31 current US$ against 5.73 current US$ in Mauritius as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Jordan and Mauritius?
- 1.58 current US$, with Jordan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Jordan and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Jordan ranks 132nd and Mauritius ranks 134th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.