Israel vs Mauritius: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Israel
4.33 current US$
in 2020
Mauritius
5.73 current US$
in 2020
Israel rank
137th
Mauritius rank
134th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 5.73 current US$ against 4.33 current US$ in Israel, a difference of 1.4 current US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Israel's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 137th and Mauritius ranks 134th of 150 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Israel | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 11.29 current US$ | 14.58 current US$ | 3.29 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 1.89 current US$ | 12.48 current US$ | 10.58 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 1.9 current US$ | 7.35 current US$ | 5.45 current US$ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 4.33 current US$ | 5.73 current US$ | 1.4 current US$ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Israel or Mauritius?
- Mauritius, at 5.73 current US$ against 4.33 current US$ in Israel as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Israel and Mauritius?
- 1.4 current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Israel ranks 137th and Mauritius ranks 134th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.