Iceland vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Iceland
1.9 current US$
in 2020
Singapore
3.27 current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
142nd
Singapore rank
141st
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Iceland
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 3.27 current US$ against 1.9 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 1.37 current US$.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.7 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Singapore ahead.
Iceland ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 141st of 150 countries.
Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 4.29 current US$ | 4.29 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 3.44 current US$ | 3.44 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2010s | 3.5 current US$ | 5.08 current US$ | 1.58 current US$ | Singapore |
| 2020s | 1.9 current US$ | 3.27 current US$ | 1.36 current US$ | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Iceland or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 3.27 current US$ against 1.9 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Iceland and Singapore?
- 1.37 current US$, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Iceland ranks 142nd and Singapore ranks 141st of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.