Iceland vs Iraq: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Iceland
1.9 current US$
in 2020
Iraq
4.01 current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
142nd
Iraq rank
139th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Iceland
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 4.01 current US$ against 1.9 current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 2.11 current US$.
That makes Iraq's figure about 2.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Iraq has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 142nd and Iraq ranks 139th of 150 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 3.7 current US$ | 3.7 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0 current US$ | 3.45 current US$ | 3.45 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2010s | 3.5 current US$ | 5.63 current US$ | 2.13 current US$ | Iraq |
| 2020s | 1.9 current US$ | 4.01 current US$ | 2.1 current US$ | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Iceland or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 4.01 current US$ against 1.9 current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Iceland and Iraq?
- 2.11 current US$, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Iraq?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Iceland and Iraq rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Iceland ranks 142nd and Iraq ranks 139th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.