Guinea vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Guinea
1,140 current US$
in 2020
South Africa
1,078 current US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
29th
South Africa rank
30th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Guinea
- South Africa
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 1,140 current US$ against 1,078 current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 62 current US$.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Guinea has been ahead every year.
Guinea ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 30th of 151 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 956.36 current US$ | 762.21 current US$ | 194.15 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 1,081 current US$ | 853.77 current US$ | 227.46 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 1,606 current US$ | 1,009 current US$ | 597.15 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2020s | 1,140 current US$ | 1,078 current US$ | 61.77 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Guinea or South Africa?
- Guinea, at 1,140 current US$ against 1,078 current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Guinea and South Africa?
- 62 current US$, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and South Africa?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Guinea ranks 29th and South Africa ranks 30th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.