Guinea vs Montenegro: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Guinea
1,140 current US$
in 2020
Montenegro
1,164 current US$
in 2020
Guinea rank
29th
Montenegro rank
28th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Guinea
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 1,164 current US$ against 1,140 current US$ in Guinea, a difference of 24 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Guinea ahead.
Guinea ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 28th of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,540 current US$ | 369.68 current US$ | 1,170 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 1,606 current US$ | 809.47 current US$ | 796.62 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2020s | 1,140 current US$ | 1,164 current US$ | 24.14 current US$ | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Guinea or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 1,164 current US$ against 1,140 current US$ in Guinea as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Guinea and Montenegro?
- 24 current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Montenegro?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Guinea and Montenegro rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Guinea ranks 29th and Montenegro ranks 28th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.