Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Guinea-Bissau
1,832 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,761 current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau rank
18th
Zambia rank
20th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Zambia
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 1,832 current US$ against 1,761 current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 71 current US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th and Zambia ranks 20th of 151 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,274 current US$ | 654.72 current US$ | 619.32 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 1,493 current US$ | 1,378 current US$ | 115.06 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2010s | 2,414 current US$ | 2,308 current US$ | 105.99 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 1,832 current US$ | 1,761 current US$ | 71.22 current US$ | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Guinea-Bissau or Zambia?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 1,832 current US$ against 1,761 current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
- 71 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 18th and Zambia ranks 20th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.