Guatemala vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Guatemala
698.07 current US$
in 2020
Serbia
700.22 current US$
in 2020
Guatemala rank
51st
Serbia rank
50th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Guatemala
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 700.22 current US$ against 698.07 current US$ in Guatemala, a difference of 2.15 current US$.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 51st and Serbia ranks 50th of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 400.82 current US$ | 259.33 current US$ | 141.49 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 789.34 current US$ | 572.61 current US$ | 216.73 current US$ | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 698.07 current US$ | 700.22 current US$ | 2.15 current US$ | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Guatemala or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 700.22 current US$ against 698.07 current US$ in Guatemala as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Guatemala and Serbia?
- 2.15 current US$, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Guatemala ranks 51st and Serbia ranks 50th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.