Georgia vs Mauritania: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Georgia
87.63 current US$
in 2020
Mauritania
89.01 current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
116th
Mauritania rank
114th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Georgia
- Mauritania
How they compare
Mauritania currently reports 89.01 current US$ against 87.63 current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 1.38 current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mauritania ahead.
Georgia ranks 116th and Mauritania ranks 114th of 150 countries.
Mauritania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mauritania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.2 current US$ | 145.46 current US$ | 125.26 current US$ | Mauritania |
| 2000s | 56.73 current US$ | 104.4 current US$ | 47.67 current US$ | Mauritania |
| 2010s | 84.69 current US$ | 126.28 current US$ | 41.59 current US$ | Mauritania |
| 2020s | 87.63 current US$ | 89.01 current US$ | 1.37 current US$ | Mauritania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Georgia or Mauritania?
- Mauritania, at 89.01 current US$ against 87.63 current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Georgia and Mauritania?
- 1.38 current US$, with Mauritania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mauritania?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Mauritania rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Georgia ranks 116th and Mauritania ranks 114th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.