Finland vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Finland
3,792 current US$
in 2020
Suriname
3,763 current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
9th
Suriname rank
10th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Finland
- Suriname
How they compare
Finland currently reports 3,792 current US$ against 3,763 current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 29 current US$.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Finland has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 9th and Suriname ranks 10th of 150 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,786 current US$ | 302.41 current US$ | 2,484 current US$ | Finland |
| 2000s | 2,800 current US$ | 343.57 current US$ | 2,457 current US$ | Finland |
| 2010s | 3,894 current US$ | 2,244 current US$ | 1,650 current US$ | Finland |
| 2020s | 3,792 current US$ | 3,763 current US$ | 28.52 current US$ | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Finland or Suriname?
- Finland, at 3,792 current US$ against 3,763 current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Finland and Suriname?
- 29 current US$, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Suriname?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Finland ranks 9th and Suriname ranks 10th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.