Finland vs Malaysia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Finland
3,792 current US$
in 2020
Malaysia
4,416 current US$
in 2020
Finland rank
9th
Malaysia rank
8th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Finland
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 4,416 current US$ against 3,792 current US$ in Finland, a difference of 624 current US$.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 9th and Malaysia ranks 8th of 150 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2,786 current US$ | 6,784 current US$ | 3,997 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 2,800 current US$ | 5,251 current US$ | 2,451 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 3,894 current US$ | 5,252 current US$ | 1,358 current US$ | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 3,792 current US$ | 4,416 current US$ | 624.62 current US$ | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Finland or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 4,416 current US$ against 3,792 current US$ in Finland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Finland and Malaysia?
- 624 current US$, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Finland and Malaysia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Finland ranks 9th and Malaysia ranks 8th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.