Eswatini vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Eswatini
1,499 current US$
in 2020
Zambia
1,761 current US$
in 2020
Eswatini rank
23rd
Zambia rank
20th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Eswatini
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 1,761 current US$ against 1,499 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 262 current US$.
That makes Zambia's figure about 1.2 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,053 current US$ | 654.72 current US$ | 398.06 current US$ | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 884.53 current US$ | 1,378 current US$ | 493.59 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2010s | 1,230 current US$ | 2,308 current US$ | 1,078 current US$ | Zambia |
| 2020s | 1,499 current US$ | 1,761 current US$ | 261.99 current US$ | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Eswatini or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 1,761 current US$ against 1,499 current US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Eswatini and Zambia?
- 262 current US$, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Zambia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Eswatini and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Eswatini ranks 23rd and Zambia ranks 20th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.