Egypt vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Egypt
1.27 current US$
in 2020
Iceland
1.9 current US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
144th
Iceland rank
142nd
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Egypt
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1.9 current US$ against 1.27 current US$ in Egypt, a difference of 0.63 current US$.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 144th and Iceland ranks 142nd of 150 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.27 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 1.27 current US$ | Egypt |
| 2000s | 1.29 current US$ | 0 current US$ | 1.29 current US$ | Egypt |
| 2010s | 2.19 current US$ | 3.5 current US$ | 1.31 current US$ | Iceland |
| 2020s | 1.27 current US$ | 1.9 current US$ | 0.6373 current US$ | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Egypt or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 1.9 current US$ against 1.27 current US$ in Egypt as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Egypt and Iceland?
- 0.63 current US$, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Egypt and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Egypt ranks 144th and Iceland ranks 142nd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.