Ecuador vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital per capita, timber
Ecuador
482.77 current US$
in 2020
Sudan
476.77 current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
66th
Sudan rank
67th
Renewable natural capital per capita, timber over time
- Ecuador
- Sudan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 482.77 current US$ against 476.77 current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 6 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Ecuador ranks 66th and Sudan ranks 67th of 150 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 523.81 current US$ | 670.2 current US$ | 146.39 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2020s | 482.77 current US$ | 476.77 current US$ | 5.99 current US$ | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital per capita, timber, Ecuador or Sudan?
- Ecuador, at 482.77 current US$ against 476.77 current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital per capita, timber between Ecuador and Sudan?
- 6 current US$, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital per capita, timber?
- Ecuador ranks 66th and Sudan ranks 67th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital per capita, timber (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.